No. You Don't See Russia From Your House




The game of the Global-Elites (Who are of both Right, and Left) has revealed itself. The intent is to undermine (or much worse...) President Donald J. Trump's government, by spreading propaganda that his lawful and fair election, was not lawful. As an added bonus, they seek to instigate a conflict between the United States, and Russian Federation. To what end? I am not sure. But I do know it will end badly for everyone, on both sides.

Ask yourself this: Would we be hearing about so-called, Russian 'hacking', had Hillary Clinton been elected? Doubtful. Yes they sowed the seeds for this ploy during the campaign, but walked it back when they were certain Hillary was going to win. Turns out the Elites bought into their own propaganda, were dramatically wrong in their calculations.

Six weeks before Inauguration Day, they've begun to ramp up this fake Russian hacking meme, making assertions, but never providing proof. They need to get it out there before Donald J. Trump legally assumes office and puts the kibosh on it.

More to the point. This plan, whatever its ultimate outcome, reaches back at least 4 years, to the reelection of Barack Obama. Proof of it can be seen in the 'debate' between Obama, and Mitt Romney, where Mittens asserted Russia was a "threat" and Obama zinged: "The 1980s, want their foreign policy back". That was nothing but a sham, to provide a Barack Obama a zinger and make him look smart, all while planting the seeds of where we are now.

The goal was for Obama's successor - Assumed to be, Hillary Clinton to ratchet up conflict with Russia.  Only thing is, no one saw the chaotic introduction of Donald J. Trump into the mix, and they, in their hubris underestimated him. The Elites system has only been rocked three times. First by JFK, and then Ronald Reagan, and now by Donald J. Trump.

Conspiracies aren't always vertical, often they are horizontal. A conspiracy needs neither central planning, or dark figures to be a conspiracy. A horizontal conspiracy requires only an aggregate of like minds join together in an agreed upon goal. and this can be done without the traditional smoke filled backrooms. The Globalist-Elite need us to be a party to our own destruction. Why? Simple. You can't maintain absolute control over a system and they need to be able to say 'You chose this' if things go awry. Its to put the blame on us.

A striking fact about this whole Russia nonsense is, how the polarity has shifted. The same people who denied a Communist plot to undermine the USA back in the 80s, now assert Putin achieved what the much stronger USSR, never could. That's insane...

I'll leave you with this. From Sundance, who unlike the entire lying Media, actually got the 2016 Election broadly correct, and has more, or less accurately outlined events as they have unfolded.

Addendum 2: President-elect Trump , cutting out CIA briefings, and this "Russian Hack" Fake News, are one and same issue. Would you take briefings from an agency trying to undermine, or manipulate you into a needless conflict? Evan McMullin, a CIA stooge was run as a 'candidate' to try to throw the election to Congress and put Hillary in the White House. The forces that existed against DJT remain, and are waging a last ditch effort to retake control.

Don't be fooled!

Addendum:


In the UK, one single article sums up the total abnegation of all journalistic standards. The truly execrable Jonathan Freedland of the Guardian writes “Few credible sources doubt that Russia was behind the hacking of internal Democratic party emails, whose release by Julian Assange was timed to cause maximum pain to Hillary Clinton and pleasure for Trump.” Does he produce any evidence at all for this assertion? No, none whatsoever. What does a journalist mean by a “credible source”? Well, any journalist worth their salt in considering the credibility of a source will first consider access. Do they credibly have access to the information they claim to have?
Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness. Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth telling.
Contrast this to the “credible sources” Freedland relies on. What access do they have to the whistleblower? Zero. They have not the faintest idea who the whistleblower is. Otherwise they would have arrested them. What reputation do they have for truthfulness? It’s the Clinton gang and the US government, for goodness sake.
In fact, the sources any serious journalist would view as “credible” give the opposite answer to the one Freedland wants. But in what passes for Freedland’s mind, “credible” is 100% synonymous with “establishment”. When he says “credible sources” he means “establishment sources”. That is the truth of the “fake news” meme. You are not to read anything unless it is officially approved by the élite and their disgusting, crawling whores of stenographers like Freedland.
Via Sparta Report.


Comments